The logic may lean that way, but we can't be sure the Supreme Court values the Second Amendment's application that strongly.
Posted By Sreedhar Pillai at Sunday, January 22, 2012||PERMALINK Labels: #lrose, India, Social Web, Supreme Court, Vodafone
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@Check Google Listing of this Post?
Email this article to a friend.
Add Me To Your Network
Read Related Stories
Email this article to a friend.
visitors read this post
underbelly, its cricket pride, is being battered around the world, it looks
like its judiciary thinks it is time to play ball. The Supreme Court has ruled
that the $2.2
billion claim of the Indian tax department on Vodafone for the
purchase of shares from India
is illegal. It has taken the judges of the Supreme Court to see that Hutchinson
needs to play fair to claim its position among the G20. India
No doubt, the remaining ‘five star’ communists of
and its available polit buro in India ,
will see this as an overture by Indian judiciary, even a gross capitulation, to
the American Imperialism. However its cautious secretary, Prakash
Karat is likely to stay clear of any comments against the judgement as it
can be construed as contempt of court in Delhi
for which he can be locked up in the infamous Tihar Jail which already holds a
number of Indian politicians. India
The credibility of India, as a democratic nation ripe and mature for free market and holding out huge potential for growth, which attracted massive inflow of western capital in recent years, was going for a toss, abetted by all kinds of obstructionist and partisan politics as well as sporadic vigilante activism.
In fact one of the Supreme Court judges who qualified the tax as “Capital Punishment”, an act against capitalism. The demand for $2.2 billion in capital gains tax "would amount to imposing capital punishment for capital investment since it lacks authority of law...," K.S. Radhakrishnan, one of the three judges ruling on the case, said in his order.
It looks like, fortunately for India, its judiciary, the only democratic institution with power to arbitrate on contentious political issues, has come to realise that it is time for India to behave like a true G20 nation to lay its claim to a seat.
Despite the moral aspect of the case, arising out of the fact that the case related to taxing a deal between two foreign multinationals which operated and generated the capital gain over operations in the Indian soil, and previous judgement by the lower courts and by itself against Vodafone, the Supreme Court has chosen to arrest the damage to the reputation of India as a safe destination for foreign capital.
Can this be taken as a sign that doing business in India is entirely safe for foreign companies? The truth is that
has only seen a series of set backs to its growth in the past year and faced
with huge budget deficit, has no choice but to aggressively attract foreign
For the political movements which prefer to drive looking in the rear mirror, like that of Prakash Karat, it is time to stop over and consult their road maps like the political redefining of ideology he has recently published.
For the Indian leadership which in fact realised that this is only way out, from the days when India went nearly bankrupt from its socialist agenda of four decades, in the late nineties, it is a matter of continuing the reforms it has initiated and taking the fast lane to progress.
Article first published in TECHNORATI ashttp://technorati.com/business/article/is-the-vodafone-judgement-a-signal/
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive updates right in your inbox.